Schools expected to raise their game in exchange for funding and freedom (Knowsley Liberal Democrats)

Schools expected to raise their game in exchange for funding and freedom

March 6, 2010 5:01 AM
Originally published by UK Liberal Democrats

Nick Clegg will argue that in return for the investment of an additional £2.5bn in schools, teachers will be put under pressure to 'raise their game' to reinvent the curriculum, increase the number of children achieving good results and close the gap between disadvantaged pupils and their wealthier classmates.

He will also attack the Conservatives for pledging to help poorer pupils without allocating any funding to pay for it and accuse the Government of 'not funding, but buying' schools

To give every child a fair start in life, the Liberal Democrats will spend an extra £2.5bn on schools, guaranteeing them the money they need to support children who are struggling.

Nick Clegg will say:

"Today, I ask our schools and colleges to sign up to a deal with the Liberal Democrats: We will give you everything we can. We will find you extra funding, even while elsewhere there are cuts. We will give a level of freedom you haven't known for decades. But, in return, we will place the greatest expectations on you any government ever has.

"One - we will expect you to transform the curriculum, so that it is rich, relevant, and stretches the brightest pupils while elevating those who struggle. Two - we will be much more ambitious about the number of young men and women leaving school with good results. Three - we will expect you to close the gap between poorer children and their wealthier classmates. A gap which entrenches inequality in Britain today.

"That deal is a new settlement for schools and government. Once it is in place we will get on with governing, you will get on with teaching, and children will benefit most of all. Let's take our side of the bargain first. We are proposing an extra investment of £2.5bn for our schools. Around an extra £2,500 will be allocated for each pupil in receipt of free school meals. Raising the amount allocated for the poorest children to levels spent per pupil in fee-paying schools.

"The budgets of schools with similar catchments, but in different parts of the country, can vary wildly. Our Pupil Premium ensures every school taking a child from a disadvantaged background, no matter where it is, gets extra money to provide extra support.

"Money you can spend as you see fit - perhaps to cut class sizes, provide extra one-to-one tuition, evening or weekend classes. It would be up to you.

"Unlike the Conservatives, who have promised money to help poorer pupils without actually allocating a single penny to pay for it, we want to give schools certainty about the resources they can expect.

"So, to be absolutely clear: our Pupil Premium is new money. As the IFS pointed out earlier this week, unless a Pupil Premium is funded with extra cash, many schools - particularly secondaries - will suffer significant budget cuts.

"Labour didn't fund schools, they bought schools. The price of unprecedented investment was untrammelled control.

"So, more freedom, more funding, that is our side of the bargain. What about yours? We will give you money, we will cut the reins, but our expectations on you will be high. We will expect you to reinvent the curriculum so it is broad and relevant. We will expect you to increase the number of children achieving good results. We will expect you to close the gap between disadvantaged pupils and their wealthier peers.

"I am tired of the buck passing that dominates the debate over education in this country. When pupils do badly, government blames schools, schools blame government, and parents are left watching endless finger-pointing that does nothing to help their children.

"We want to make Britain a place where it is no longer possible, on a pupil's first day of school, to predict how well they'll do simply by asking them how much their parents earn.

"So, a deal between government and schools: Money and freedom in return for high expectations and more ambition."

Knowsley Liberal Democrats